Random Number GodsRNG · Enemy Territory · Battlefield · D&D
Friday BF64 + Sunday D&D

Check the calendar. ET pubs running the new Frostbite rotation all week.

Death Stranding 2: a great story sequel, a bad gameplay expansion

Permalink Preview Print Review
xapoh2002
Engineer
Members
36 posts 24 Sep 2018 joined
25 Aug 2026 at 00:59 #1

I'll start this review by saying that I am probably not the target audience for the Death Stranding franchise. I've tried to get into Kojima's stories before, and I ended up bouncing off a lot of the MGS games. I also played through the entire first Death Stranding and thought that the story was just ok. Unlike most that played Death Stranding, I didn't really stick around for the story, I actually found the gameplay to be its main appeal for me.

The gameplay of Death Stranding is super unique and ticks pretty much all the boxes that I wanted out of a logistics sim/survival hybrid. While it could have been better balanced, I thought the core gameplay was so unique and special that I played for over 200 hours in the endgame. The variations in terrain and delivery tech, along with unique hazards separated Death Stranding from other delivery-focused games, like Cloudpunk and the Truck Simulators. I often felt like I actually had to plan my route, often backtracking when I opted to wing it.

As Death Stranding 2 was revealed and subsequently released on PS, I had high hopes that the mechanical aspect of the game would be expanded on more heavily. I wanted more natural disasters, delivery tech, hazards in the world, and unique terrain. I heard a lot before I got the game about how some of these mechanics would be expanded into DS2, and I was excited! I waited for about a year for them to port it onto PC, all while tapping my foot very impatiently. Wrong sub, I know.

Eventually I did get my hands on the game, and at first I was a big, big fan. The world was beautiful. I was put into a dust storm right away, which slowed me down if I was headwind, and affected my balance if the wind was behind me or to my sides. They introduced exoskeletons very early, and I was actually starting to get down with some of the Kojima story wackiness! In fact, I think the entire duration of the story was quite fun for me. What quickly started to show its cracks, however, was the balance of delivering.

It was way, WAY too easy. Like, don't plan a route at all, just take a bike, forget about the canteen easy. Terrain was no longer an issue for vehicles. There weren't any areas that pushed me to go on-foot, like the first game's ravines and dense rock placement. Mountains barely reacted to my vehicle, I could go up what felt like 70 degree inclines in the vehicles that would have otherwise flipped or slid down those very same inclines. Meter management did not matter, stamina made no difference on my carrying abilities (and most of the time I wouldn't even use it, because of the OP vehicles).

The preparation that I remember doing throughout Death Stranding 1 was completely unnecessary here. I often didn't check where I was going on main orders until I had already accepted them. The extent of my decision making for most deliveries/missions ends at "am I going into combat or not". Simply put, the gameplay that I remember didn't really matter anymore, because nothing was pushing back against me.

Now, you're probably wondering about those weather effects that I was praising when I picked up the game. The issue with these events... they're pretty much all scripted story events. Yep, that landslide in the intro when you are taking Lou around Mexico? Never happened again to me, after nearly 100 hours of endgame time. The same for the avalanche and dust storm. Needless to say, this was extremely disappointing for me.

There was, of course, a bunch of new tech to be unlocked that would expand my delivery options and make things easier for me. But I didn't need things to be easier, I barely used structures or tech anyway! Each new unlock (unless it was combat-related) was essentially forgotten about considering I could just take a vehicle everywhere. Not to mention, there's upgrades for the vehicles too.

So all in all, the main reason that I don't like DS2 as a sequel is just due to the lack of difficulty or pushback on the player. Oftentimes it felt like what DS1 was accused of being, a "walking simulator". But instead of walking, you're just driving. And unlike the "walking sim" of the first game, there's not much in the way of planning your route or bringing specific items to help. The item that helps is the truck.

But, I don't want to end the review there, as I do have quite a lot of good stuff to say about DS2.

For one, the story hooked me a lot more than the first game's story. I still think Higgs is a relatively uninteresting antagonist, which is why the inclusion of ALLMIND was a very welcome one for me. I also liked the twist with Lou (even though it was quite obvious from the moment we meet Tomorrow). I also think that Sam just gets waaaay more character development in this game, as opposed to the first game where he felt more like a vehicle (no pun intended) just to get the plot along up until the final moments of the game. I also liked the preppers and side characters more.

Along with the more interesting story, I also found that there were a ton of quality of life improvements that I wanted to see implemented into the first game. Things like being able to rearrange cargo without menuing, streamlined UI, and a dedicated Hangar to store all of our gear and vehicles in one, centralised location.

I loved how big the map was, and how it felt more varied in terms of biomes and environments. DS2's map makes the first game feel tiny in comparison, and while that may have made the map design suffer in comparison, I atleast can appreciate the variety that comes with sightseeing in varied locations. Also expanded were the default structures in-world, the inclusion of Monorails was pretty cool and I also appreciated the upgrades to roads.

Well, there's my Death Stranding 2 review. I think a lot of others liked it as a sequel because of its good story follow-up, and maybe they were more of a passive fan of the gameplay of the first game. Or didn't go as in-depth as I did into the endgame.

xapoh2002 - D&D nights
Nat 1s are character development.

porongososo
Field Medic
Members
26 posts 26 Jan 2022 joined
25 Aug 2026 at 01:17 #2

Thanks for the review - i have slowly (insanely slowly) been making my way through DS1. I really love it, and I'm already a big Kojima fan so it scratches the itch nicely.

I'm looking forward to DS2, but have heard similar things in terms of it being insanely easy.

Question - have you increased the difficulty?

porongososo - Lurker
I read more than I post.

xapoh2002
Engineer
Members
36 posts 24 Sep 2018 joined
25 Aug 2026 at 01:18 #3

Yes, I started on the hardest difficulty at the time, and my current save file is on the hardest difficulty, "to the Wilder". Unfortunately it doesn't affect the deliveries much and seems to impact enemy health/damage much more :(

xapoh2002 - D&D nights
Nat 1s are character development.

porongososo
Field Medic
Members
26 posts 26 Jan 2022 joined
25 Aug 2026 at 01:21 #4

Darn, that's a shame!

porongososo - Lurker
I read more than I post.

urldmf
Engineer
Members
35 posts 11 Jan 2025 joined
25 Aug 2026 at 01:27 #5

Honestly this hits the nail on the head for me.

There are so many quality of life upgrades in DS2 compared to DS1 that the game should be much better for it. But it's not.

It's still a really good game and I enjoyed it a lot. But I really did miss the difficulty of the first game.

Honestly the best part for me what when I came off the grid to go up the mountain, and you have 3? Missions back to back where you have to get to the mountaineer, find his son and then find him. And none of that is on the grid.

It was actually difficult, and it was so much better for it.

I can see why they toned the difficulty down a bit. But I didn't have to leave my truck for 90% of the game.

urldmf - Axis defense
Do not walk my MG line twice.

Ghostfox
Random Number God
Map Team
272 posts 1 Jun 2019 joined
25 Aug 2026 at 01:47 #6

that's a real shame. i really liked the mechanics of the first game, and i've wanted to pick up the second for awhile now.

i thought the story in the first game was goofy fun more than anything, and really don't have much interest in a continuation of that narrative. though i'm sure this one has it's own charm.

i'd heard this one relied more heavily on vehicles which was a bit of a turn off already. do you really not spend much time planning routes and walking there? that's like 90% of my enjoyment in the first game. i absolutely loved rebuilding the highways, planning and building an efficient zipline network... actually using them to make deliveries was pretty boring though.

Ghostfox - Map Team Lead
If the waypoints are wrong, ping me - not the server.

Banan321
Field Medic
Members
31 posts 7 Nov 2023 joined
25 Aug 2026 at 01:47 #7

People complaining about difficulty always end up making a franchise worse in the long run. Seen it with so many franchises.

Banan321 - ET pubs
See you on rng-et-1.

xapoh2002
Engineer
Members
36 posts 24 Sep 2018 joined
25 Aug 2026 at 01:52 #8

>i'd heard this one relied more heavily on vehicles which was a bit of a turn off already. do you really not spend much time planning routes and walking there?

Unfortunately, no. Since the terrain is much less hostile and honestly much more flat than the original game, there's very few areas that will allow the player to put themselves in a "corner" of sorts through bad planning. It's really easy to just follow the objective markers directly to locations, as pretty much every obstacle is solved by driving around it.

I was like you and ignored the ziplines/vehicles in the first game for the most part, but the size of the map in DS2 combined with the lack of hazards makes on-foot delivery almost obsolete, outside of some story missions.

xapoh2002 - D&D nights
Nat 1s are character development.

kizunakip
Field Medic
Members
33 posts 4 Apr 2024 joined
25 Aug 2026 at 02:01 #9

About 22 hours in and this reflects my thoughts so far. I’d probably think it was pretty good if I never played the first one, but it’s such a disappointment compared to it.

kizunakip - Lurker
I read more than I post.

Alwiora
Engineer
Members
40 posts 25 Sep 2023 joined
25 Aug 2026 at 02:03 #10

I couldn't disagree more. :) Cheers

Alwiora - Allies rifle
Spawn on me.

xapoh2002
Engineer
Members
36 posts 24 Sep 2018 joined
25 Aug 2026 at 02:04 #11

And that's ok! Glad you liked the game.

xapoh2002 - D&D nights
Nat 1s are character development.

aichenjb
Engineer
Members
38 posts 9 Sep 2023 joined
25 Aug 2026 at 02:05 #12

It's not just difficulty for the sake of it, I have not played 2 but 1 fails in its central fantasy more often than not. "Help others" "build shelters" "plan ahead" for what? So much of the game is just flat terrain with no reason to prepare other than a basic ladder, time fall and BTs are a non issue so why build timefall shelters or worse why use them when it's just a minor inconvenience. The central horror element of the game has no legs.

aichenjb - BF support
Ammo box is friendship.

Ghostfox
Random Number God
Map Team
272 posts 1 Jun 2019 joined
25 Aug 2026 at 02:10 #13

i'll probably will play it eventually, but i'm pushing it further down the list to someday.

maybe a director's cut/complete edition could mitigate some of this, but it sounds like map and mission design would make this hard to achieve.

seeing that the harder difficulties didn't really impact this is also frustrating.

Ghostfox - Map Team Lead
If the waypoints are wrong, ping me - not the server.

Sign in to reply.