The 100 points attachment system is very flawed.

Apart from being a straight ripoff COD, I absolutely despite this points system about how you only have 100 points to dump between a grip, a magazine, a sight, and a barrel. In 2042 and the previous games, each attachment had its own pros and cons.
-Suppressors would keep you off minimaps but reduce velocity
-Extended barrels would increase velocity but decrease ADS time
-Laser sights would improve hip fire accuracy but give away your position
The result was a brilliant and strategic Tetris styled system of "make the build that's just right for you." In 6, they ditched that in favor of a points system. A thermal scope is worth 25 out of 100 points because "we feel like it." Suppressors range form 20 to 30 points because.... reasons. A 27 (that's such a strange number) round magazine is worth 45 points in a KV9. WHAT THE HELL? This is just half effort excuse of "you do the balancing for yourself.'
The result is a carefully curated meta of YTers telling players what attachments to use for each gun. Everyone rocks the same build now. You nerf one gun? Everyone moves onto the next most powerful meta and the next and so on and so forth. It's very poorly designed. There's no variety. VSSM and VCR are now pointless to use ever because of the points for some of the attachments are so expensive and the precision is so low.
The best thing to do is to just get rid of the points system outright and bring back pros/cons to every attachment. Large magazines should decrease ADS and increase reload times. Suppressors should keep you off minimaps but decrease range. Thermal scopes are great for spotting enemies but can't see through windows and have glare. Why wouldn't they use this system? It's damn near perfect, makes the most amount of sense and requires the least amount of future balancing. Or redo some of the costs and balancing. Nothing should be worth more than 20 points.