Random Number GodsRNG · Enemy Territory · Battlefield · D&D
Friday BF64 + Sunday D&D

Check the calendar. ET pubs running the new Frostbite rotation all week.

Do you think DICE will change their approach after seeing WARDOG success with slower gameplay?

Permalink Preview Print BF
wheatley76
Field Medic
Members
34 posts 3 Feb 2021 joined
7 Sep 2026 at 16:18 #1

DICE obsession with fast paced gameplay and player movement is killing our beloved franchise.

WARDOG beta success happened because slower paced play and using tactic instead run and gun

wheatley76 - Axis defense
Do not walk my MG line twice.

PulpEnjoyer
Field Medic
Members
23 posts 17 Jan 2025 joined
7 Sep 2026 at 16:22 #2

no, they are two different games lmao

PulpEnjoyer - Allies rifle
Spawn on me.

oleshka1337228
Field Medic
Members
29 posts 14 Jul 2019 joined
7 Sep 2026 at 16:23 #3

Two completely genres of game, no idea why you'd think BF which has been fully released for a significant amount of time is about to reinvent the game because of Wardogs.

oleshka1337228 - BF support
Ammo box is friendship.

ddafafaf4
Field Medic
Members
28 posts 25 Aug 2021 joined
7 Sep 2026 at 16:23 #4

Movement isn’t even that fast. It’s fine. Wardogs is a different game with different mechanics. No reason for DICE to change anything because of it.

ddafafaf4 - Old guard
Jaymod days. Still here.

maxAv3x
Panzer Ace
Members
100 posts 24 Apr 2023 joined
7 Sep 2026 at 16:23 #5

no, they see COD failing and wanna fill that void so they'll keep leaning into COD like shit to try and siphon that communities refugees...

maxAv3x - Trial / new blood
Still learning the smokes.

s1nce_2k
Field Medic
Members
34 posts 11 Sep 2019 joined
7 Sep 2026 at 16:24 #6

They’re both great games, but battlefield is an arcade shooter and war dogs is taking the more grounded, tactical approach. I don’t think battlefield needs to adapt war dogs style because the franchise has never focused on slow gameplay and I don’t think it suddenly needs to.

s1nce_2k - ET pubs
See you on rng-et-1.

Shq11
Engineer
Members
43 posts 19 Nov 2019 joined
7 Sep 2026 at 16:25 #7

Lol "Beta success"

Shq11 - Lurker
I read more than I post.

Samurai2014
Engineer
Members
37 posts 3 Nov 2019 joined
7 Sep 2026 at 16:27 #8

Good God, just go play war dogs bro ffs

Samurai2014 - Map votes
Frostbite supremacy.

pearneko
Engineer
Members
36 posts 8 Jan 2021 joined
7 Sep 2026 at 16:27 #9

Nope

pearneko - ET / smokes
Utility first.

TRAtes27
Field Medic
Members
30 posts 17 Nov 2018 joined
7 Sep 2026 at 16:30 #10

Agenda much?

TRAtes27 - BF support
Ammo box is friendship.

JustFrey
Covert Ops
Members
66 posts 30 Nov 2024 joined
7 Sep 2026 at 16:30 #11
because the franchise has never focused on slow gameplay
Battlefield 1942 is rolling in its grave

JustFrey - Lurker
I read more than I post.

FinnBarrah
Engineer
Members
43 posts 10 Mar 2022 joined
7 Sep 2026 at 16:31 #12

No, they’re entirely different genres. BF has literally never played anything close to how Wardogs plays.

This is like asking if DICE will balance their guns differently because of the new CS2 update.

FinnBarrah - Axis defense
Do not walk my MG line twice.

FoxLeks
Squad Lead
Members
80 posts 9 Nov 2024 joined
7 Sep 2026 at 16:31 #13

I have 1k+ hours in bf6 . After playing wardogs, there was definitely some things bf6 could do to move the needle in that direction.

Examples: Minimum 5 second down time before being able to give up.

Continue to make the difference between guns and engagement ranges real. (#1 for me). Using a lmg with bipod in wardogs was an EXPERIENCE. I have hit 50 in all weapon and weapon categories and to be honest they MOSTLY play the same, just moving the optimal engagement range between 10 to 50m (where almost all engagements take place in most maps anyways) .

Improve logistics and vehicle transport: tsuru was a great start for making transport helis great again. More things to make those types of vehicles and team work matter.

These are just a few examples.

FoxLeks - D&D nights
Nat 1s are character development.

Sign in to reply.